Having it turned on is something you will probably want in most other shooting conditions. You still get 425 contrast detect points that cover the entire frame, perfect to get the most out of the best lenses for the Sony a7III. Above we compare the A7 III to the 26-megapixel Canon 6D Mark II DSLR (the 5D Mark IV sells for over $1000 more than the Sony, so the $1600 6D Mark II is a closer competitor in terms of price). The largest size we print at is 30 x 40 inches, so up to ISO 800, you're really limited by how much you want to push the resolving power of the A7 III's 24-megapixel sensor. Sigma’s award-winning Art … This means that if you are shooting with the camera set to write each image to both cards, the write speed will be bottle-necked by the slower card. It happens so rarely it’s not a huge deal, but happens enough that I noticed it was doing something weird. Panasonic S5 – very capable with internal 10-bit, vlog, anamorphic, etc… just not great AF-C; Canon R6 – overheating issues; Nikon ZII and Sony a7 tie because they do not have modern resolutions/refresh rates or codecs; Image Quality Image Quality From our lab and real-world testing, we've found the Sony a7 III is capable of excellent image quality - with one or two exceptions. ISO 204,800 images are, unfortunately, much too noisy and lacking in fine detail for us to consider them usable for quality prints. The image quality from the Sony A7 III is exactly what you have come to expect from Sony. There are things I wish could be fixed or added that will probably never happen, but even knowing that, I’m jumping all in and selling my Fuji and Nikon kit. Note that the very high ISO is responsible for deterioration of the image quality. Amazing! Perhaps taking the cue from its main competitor in the mirrorless camera market, Sony has thankfully decided to continuously improvement the functionality of their products via free firmware updates. As you can see, image quality here at ISO 100 is similar in most areas, however the Mark III does a much better job with fine detail in our tricky red-leaf swatch, resolving many of the individual threads that the A7 II blurs away as if noise. So for a mere $100 more with the Sony A7 III, you get a full frame camera with some of the best AF, ISO, and dynamic range you can get in a mirrorless camera. Another thing I found strange was just how long it took to format a memory card. All other camera manufactures have a lot of work ahead of them if they want to stay competitive. Colors are a little more pumped from the Sony, however they are generally more accurate from the Canon. Unsurprisingly, it's a similar story here as the A7 III clearly comes out ahead against the D500 at ISO 3200, with a much crisper, more detailed image. The 42MP on the A7RIII can make a huge difference for … When it comes to its ergonomics, the A7 III features Sony’s latest generation mirrorless body design which brings it up to date with its siblings: the A7R III and A9. That said, fine detail overall looks excellent and colors are nicely saturated, letting us easily print all the way up to 24 x 36 inches. It's a similar story at ISO 800, which as expected shows ever-so-slightly more noise, but it's still so minimal and fine detail is still abundant that a 30 x 40-inch print is definitely acceptable at this ISO. It'll be interesting to see how they compare at higher ISOs but there is a definite improvement here at base ISO. While having a 30 image buffer is definitely manageable, it still means only 3 seconds of shooting when at 10FPS. This means when shooting slow moving subjects in low light, I can use a much lower ISO to give me a cleaner image. Nothing close to being a deal breaker – I just found it strange and partially annoying. Last thing I want to talk about is the price. Color is also a little more accurate from the Sony. Luma noise is a little higher from the Fuji, though chroma noise is practically non-existent. One other feature new to this round of A7 cameras is the addition of dual memory card slots, which is something that most working professionals place a lot of value on. Jason Vinson is an award winning wedding photographer based in Buffalo. Sony E-mount 35mm F/1.8. The only issue I had was every so often, something would lag and cause the EVF not to turn on when I put my eye up to the viewfinder. Sporting a similar imaging pipeline to the A9, the Sony A7 III is capable of amazingly-large 30 x 40-inch prints from expanded low ISO 50 all the way up to ISO 800. Best value full frame mirrorless camera of the year. Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/10 f/2.8 ISO1600. The amazing thing, is that although this sensor is different than the one found on the A9, it has the same AF features – things like 693 phase-detection AF points covering 93% of the frame. The Eastcore 205,658 views Sony A7: Full HD video at up to 60fps; Sony A7 II: Full HD video at up to 60fps; Sony A7 III: 4K UHD video up to 30s, Full HD (1920x1080) up to 120fps; All three models presently in the A7 series not only boast the advantage of shooting full frame stills but also the distinct bonus of full frame video, for arguably improved image quality … So that leaves me three buttons I can use to engage the AF depending on what the situation calls for, and I never have to change a single camera setting. When I am in Memory Function 1 on the main dial, the camera sets itself to my default settings (Aperture Priority, front electronic shutter on, AF-C, Etc.). At 30 x 40 inches there is a slight bit of pixelation if you look closely, but given the viewing distance for such large prints, you're not likely to have any issues with perceived quality. Coming from the Fuji XT-2, the AF alone would be worth it for me to switch to the A7 III. Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/2000 f/2.8 ISO100. Coming from a DSLR, you’ll be blown away by this coverage. B&H has 22 user reviews already. The default in-camera JPEG processing of the A7 III creates a noticeably crisper and more detailed image which is particularly noticeable on the mosaic and fabric crops, though both cameras show obvious moiré patterns in red-leaf fabric. Sony a7III – the camera is showing its age as EVF and rear screens improve; Video. When dealing with the buffer, the Sony A7 III is listed as having a buffer that can hold 76 RAW images. It’s pretty rare for me to need to capture fast moving subjects in low light. I absolutely love the way Fuji does business and the way they constantly release firmware updates… but after shooting with the Sony A7 III, I can’t go back. The dynamic range is amazing. Now that we have the Sony A7 III though, we get some of the best features of the A9 for a fraction of the cost. From there I can easily push the file to retain those highlights and recover the shadows. The Sony A7III is now shipping. At ISO 400, we finally start to see the subtlest of hints of luminance noise, but it's such a minor amount that it doesn't affect fine detail nor print size. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture. Noise levels are higher from the Sony, though, and the "grain" pattern is a little less consistent and natural than the Canon's. Sony a7 III + Sony 85mm f/1.8 | 1/320 f/2.8 ISO100. So like in the image above, I can easily rely on the image stabilization to keep the camera shake steady and use a much lower ISO than I ever could before. ISO 25,600 prints work well up to 5 x 7 inches. I also hear this feature is great for people that shoot video. ISO 50/100/200/400/800 images all look fantastic with lots of fine detail and vibrant colors that can make excellent prints all the way up to a massive 30 x 40 inches. Sensor comparison The size of the imaging sensor is a crucial determinant of image quality.A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, … But is the A7III where it needs to be for professional use… and is it good enough for me to ditch my Fujifilm system in favour of a Sony camera?! While this may be true when it comes to price, this is far from true when it comes to features. My flash of choice is the Godox AD200, and if you haven’t seen this flash, do yourself a favor and look into it – it’s amazing! ISO 51,200 images look quite similar to the previous ISO, and we're happy with print quality also up to 5 x 7 inches. Looking at the two cameras, the Sony A7 III has an advantage over the Panasonic S5. Here at ISO 3200, the Sony A7 III leaves behind more noise than the A7 II which is especially visible in the flatter areas, but the noise "grain" appears a little tighter and more consistent, and fine detail is noticeably better in our mosaic crop. Sony a7 III RAW Samples | Editor’s Comment, Enables the possibility to operate the real-time EYE AF by half-pressing the shutter button, or by pressing the AF-ON button in AF-S and AF-C (there is no longer any need to hold down a custom key), Addition of the interval shooting function, Allows the operation with the wireless remote commander RMT-P1BT, Improves the overall stability of the camera. As seen above, Sony A7 III has a 2.3x Larger sensor area than Nikon D7200. At the end of the day, the Sony A7 III is not the perfect camera… but I don’t think there will ever be an all round perfect camera. The Nikon does better with our red-leaf fabric, though, with fewer noise reduction and aliasing artifacts. As the ISO rises, the A7 Mark III displays very well-controlled noise, which results in rather large prints despite the rising sensitivity. DxOMark is a benchmark that scientifically assesses image quality … If you have never seen Eye AF in action, it’s worth checking out. While the Sony E mount found on the Sony A7 III camera has 123 available lenses, the Leica L mount found on the Panasonic S5 has only 33 available lenses. Sony 55mm F/1.8 starting. It’s worth mentioning that these 693 AF points are the fast type! When Sony first released the Sony A7 in 2013 I was instantly intrigued. For me, 24 MegaPixels is the perfect balance between having data to crop but not so much data that you have a huge giant file. First and foremost the A7III and the A7RIII have different megapixel (MP) counts on their sensors. Incredible autofocus and high ISO performance. Switch to uncompressed RAW and this drops to less than half the buffer size. The unpredictable movements of a kid, especially close up, will give any AF system a run for its money, but the Sony A7 III knocks it out of the park. The Best Value Full Frames: Sony A7iii … This seemed to be accurate in my testing, although I never really had to boost my ISO as high as I normally would due to the image stabilization. At ISO 3200, the Sony A7R III produces a much cleaner, more contrasty image than the Canon, though the 5DS R's noise "grain" remains more consistent and natural-looking in flatter areas. At ISO 6400, for example, the Sony A7 III offers a pleasing 13 x 19-inch print and even manages a usable 5 x 7-inch print all the way up to ISO 51,200. However, at typical viewing distances for a print this large, you won't notice any issues. For those who don’t know, a firmware update is something that aims to improve your camera ‘from the inside’ – i.e. At this size, you are pushing the resolving power of the 24-megapixel sensor, as you can see very subtle pixelation if you look really closely. The A7III has 24MP while the A7RIII has 42MP. Here we can see the Sony A7 III resolves similar levels of detail with comparable noise levels, however Sony's sharpening is much more advanced producing a much crisper image with less noticeable sharpening haloes. The image quality from the Sony A7 III is exactly what you have come to expect from Sony. ISO 6400 prints top-out at 13 x 19-inches. The A7 III's two expanded ISOs, however, are best avoided for prints, as they are simply too noisy to produce usable prints. This camera comes with a staggering 42 Megapixels. It’s important to note that this is referring to compressed RAW images, which are a 12-bit file instead of 14-bit. Based around an updated 24.2-megapixel back-illuminated full-frame sensor, the A7 III … I've been shooting with the latest model, the Sony a7iii, at high ISOs to find out how well it performs in real … Contrast in our red-leaf swatch is much better from the Sony with less pattern break up from individual threads, however moiré patterns are more evident suggesting a weaker optical low-pass filter. Now, for this price you only get the body, a strap, the battery, and some documents. Using the exact same card, my Nikon D750 can format in about a second. All of these models sit at relatively similar price points and/or categories in their respective product lineups, and we decided to include the APS-C Fuji X-H1 and Nikon D500 as they offer similar burst performance to the A7 III which the similarly priced full-frame DSLRs in this comparison cannot. And remember, you can always go to our world-renowned Comparometer to compare the Sony A7 III to any camera we've ever tested. One quirky thing that you must know before using flash with this camera though is that out of the box, the electronic front curtain shutter is set to ‘on’ by default. If you are considering any of the gear used in these tests, you can find them on Amazon: Sony A6300. One thing I always struggled with was taking pictures of my son. One feature that the Sony A7 III has that I found surprisingly useful is the image stabilization. The cameras in Sony's Alpha range are well-known for their superb sensors. Jul 17, 2019. Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art. Again, the Sony A7 III's image quality is markedly better than the Nikon D500 here ate ISO 1600, producing a much sharper, more detailed image with lower noise levels. The Sony reproduces many of the offset printing colors in the mosaic crop and resolves much more of the fine thread pattern in the fabrics, but overall color is warmer and generally a little more pleasing from the Fuji. Overall, the Sony A7 III still comes out ahead here when viewed at 100% like this, but there is no denying the X-H1 does amazingly well for an APS-C camera. Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/6400 f/2.8 ISO100. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/13 f/2.8 ISO640. You can zoom an atom of a picture taken by this … If you are considering switching for image quality improvements, get a realistic idea of how much the image quality may improve. Here we compare the Sony A7 III to its predecessor, the 24-megapixel Sony A7 II, just to see how default image processing has progressed since the A7 II came out in late 2014. A7 III's built-in Image stabilization system is effective to compensate vibration up to 5.0-stops according to CIPA standards whereas A7 II's … After the release of the Sony A9 however, things were looking very promising, but with a very steep cost of entry. NOTE: These images are best quality JPEGs straight out of the camera, at default settings including noise reduction and using the camera's actual base ISO (not extended ISO settings). This sensor is like most though, where it’s a lot easier to recover shadow details then it is to recover highlight detail. The camera will then proceed to track that eye throughout the frame and automatically adjust to the other eye if it becomes the closest eye. The only option you could have is to shoot RAW to the fast card and a JPEG backup to the slow card. This new model features a new 24MP sensor that boasts 15 stops of dynamic range and ISO from 100-51,200 (expandable to 50-204,800). I have always been a huge fan of Fuji cameras and have shot the X-Pro2 and X-T2 since their release. Images at this high sensitivity display rather strong noise and signs of noise reduction processing, which together take a toll on fine detail. I also heard a lot about the Sony A7 III having a lower end EVF, but unless you are shooting it side by side with an Sony a7R III or Sony A9, you probably won’t even notice – the image in the EVF is plenty sharp and has no problem with its refresh rate. However, what the Sony a7RII lacks in aesthetics and innovation, it makes up for in sheer power. The products in this post may contain affiliate links. Now all you have to do is press one button and the camera locks onto the closest eye. The Sony A7 III continues to produce a much sharper, crisper image with better detail than the 6D II, however noise is much higher in flatter areas, and the noise "grain" is not as consistent giving the Sony image a slightly more processed look. As for shooting flash, the Sony A7 III is in line with most other models. Clicking any crop will take you to a carrier page where you can click once again to access the full resolution image as delivered straight from the camera. This is just to give you an idea of what the Sony A7 III is capable of in different lighting conditions during an average day. In April 2019, Sony released Firmware Update Version 3.00 for the a7Riii and a7iii cameras. The Sony A7 III actually scored better in low light than its brothers the A7RIII and A7SII over at DxO Mark. Weird banding caused by the electronic front curtain and HSS flash. Autofocus. Below are Still Life crops comparing Sony A7 III image quality at various ISOs with its predecessor, the Sony A7 II, and against several competing ILCs: the Canon 6D Mark II, Fuji X-H1, Nikon D750 and Nikon D500. I haven’t even added any sharpening for the web – these are JPEG versions of the RAW files, essentially straight out of camera. As you can see in the champagne spray image above, big buffers can mean getting the perfect moment. Using the Sony Carl Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 lens, I’m able to get a sharp image at 1/4th of a second handheld! Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2020. DL Cade ... as you can see in this quick side-by-side comparison of JPEGs shot on the 42MP Sony a7R III and the newly … Editor: since I own the Sony A7 III, I thought I’d include some RAW sample images from my recent wedding photography work with this camera. Both Sony A7 III and Sony A7 II has Sensor based Image stabilization which means that all the lenses will be stabilized in these bodies. This essentially makes using the more expensive UHS-II cards pointless if you plan to shoot RAW images to each card. Color from the Mark III also remains improved, giving the A7 III an overall win here. Previously, Nikon’s D750 was the golden standard for what we’ve come to expect from a 24-megapixel sensor. With all the nitpicking about buttons and menus out of the way, let’s dive into the heart of the A7 III: the photographs themselves. However, the Mark III leaves behind small areas with well-defined individual thread patterns while blurring other areas that results in a somewhat peppered look compared to the smoother but more blurred rendering of our trickly red-leaf fabric from the A7 II. Color remains a little more accurate from the Sony. Instead, Sony provide a cheaply made cable for charging via the micro USB port. This first expanded ISO level is certainly very noisy, and there's strong noise reduction occurring here, which significantly degrades detail and overall image quality. When it comes to the physical camera, I feel like the Sony A7 III has a good button layout and a nice feel in my hand. Perhaps just as i… You can check Sony a7 iii vs Canon EOS R comparison guide for detailed differences. The Sony a7 III is an entry-level full-frame camera that goes well beyond the basics in features, with excellent image quality, 10fps subject tracking, and 4K video capture. Unsurprisingly, the full-frame Sony A7 III out-performs the X-H1 here at ISO 1600, with a crisper, more detailed image overall, although moiré patterns and area/frequency-dependent noise reduction artifacts interfere with subtle detail in the red-leaf swatch. Sony A7iii is a 4k camera with an advanced 24.2 Mega Pixel BSI full-frame image sensor w/1.8X readout speed. Here, the Sony produces a sharper, crisper image with better detail and lower noise, however there are noticeable moiré patterns in the red-leaf swatch which the Fuji's X-Trans sensor helps to avoid. As you can see, the 24-megapixel A7 III generates a sharper, more detailed image than the D500, with less obvious sharpening haloes. Here we compare the A7 III to the Nikon D750, an older full-frame 24-megapixel DSLR that currently sells for about $300 less than the Sony. I understand it’s part of getting the price so low, but how much can it really cost them for a battery charger? I was even impressed coming from the Fuji XT-2, which I used to think had amazing AF coverage. Photo taken with a Sony Alpha a7iii (ILCE‑7M3) at ISO 64000 with a Sony FE 24-70mm f2.8 GM lens at … This means that you can keep using the same hardware (i.e. …and in the case of the Sony a7III, this is a significant one! At low ISO I can easily push and pull a file to my heart’s content. [Ed – Check out the Godox AD200 review after reading this, and also my recommended accessories for Sony cameras!]. ... Sony warns that image quality deteriorates rapidly as the temperature of the camera rises. Benefits and Improvements here included: Evolved Eye-AF brings the A7 series in line with the A6400 and A9 (after its recent version 5.00 update). Both of these siblings produce very crisp images with excellent detail for ISO 1600, however both luma and chroma noise appear a little higher from the A7 III, and as mentioned previously, the revised area-specific noise reduction retains more fine detail in our red-leaf swatch. The level of customization that is possible with the Sony A7 III is amazing. Unfortunately, it just wasn’t quite where it needed to be for professional use, especially in the realm of wedding photography. Both cameras produce good color, though the Sony's is a little more accurate. So instead of having to remember when to turn it on as well as having to dive into the menu to do so, I put those amazing customizations on the Sony A7 III to good use. More specifically, 5 axis stabilization. It is compatible with Sony E mount lenses and can be connected through Bluetooth to … The A7 Mark III easily wins this battle against the D750 at ISO 3200, with a much sharper, more detailed image with better color. 50+ videos Play all Mix - Canon R vs Sony A7 iii - Image quality comparison YouTube CANON EOS R REVIEW vs A7III - Duration: 17:43. There are 10 ISO settings available on the Sony A7 II. I do wish it had the dial on the left side like the Sony A9, but not a deal breaker. With careful post-processing, 30 x 40-inch print may work at this ISO, as well. Disclaimer: All recommendations are impartial and based on user experience, with no bias to the products or the brand. That’s about the same price as the Fuji XH-1, which is an APS-C crop sensor camera. Above we compare the new 24-megapixel APS-C Fuji X-H1 to the 24-megapixel full-frame Sony A7 III. When I set the dial to Manual (which I always use when using flash), the camera automatically switches the electronic front curtain shutter to off. ISO 3200 images display stronger noise, which reduces fine detail to some degree, though not by a severe amount. The Sony A7 III is a small camera that packs a huge punch for a small price. That being said, the Sony … Something worth noting is that that the Sony A7 III does support UHS-II fast memory cards, but only for one slot. The A7 III gains a significant update to its autofocus because it features a very similar … Sony a7 III + Sony 35mm f/2.8 | 1/2500 f/2.8 ISO100. For those interested in working with the RAW files involved, click these links to visit each camera's respective sample image thumbnail page: Sony A7 III, Sony A7 II, Canon 6D II, Fuji X-H1, Nikon D750 and Nikon D500 -- links to the RAW files appear beneath those for the JPEG images, wherever we have them. For example, I shoot with back button focus, so my default focus settings are Flexible Spot with AF-C. Now I also have another button set to lock-on Flexible Spot, and yet another button set to Eye AF. Note that all these images have had absolutely no post production applied whatsoever, except for a slight bump in exposure (since I tend to shoot underexposed). Color continues to be a bit more accurate from the Canon. This camera comes in at just under $2,000. Color is still more accurate and pleasing from the Canon, but overall the Sony easily comes out ahead here as we prefer to see a little noise with better detail retention versus a cleaner image which looks somewhat smeared. The refinements to the controls and design make the A7 III appreciably easier to handle than the A7 II. Sony a9. Editor’s Rating: 4.7/5. Since the A7 III already have a good in body stabilization, you would not need to have a lens with stabilization built in. But for me, what I do, and how I like to shoot, the Sony A7 III comes as close to perfect as I have ever seen. This is a game changing feature, especially with fast-moving and unpredictable subjects. Not only did the camera focus faster, more accurately, and in lower light, but it also has something called Eye AF. The A7 III continues to produce a crisper, more contrasty and detailed image than the X-H1 here at ISO 3200. In the same price range, Canon EOS R has a better viewfinder. ISO 1600 prints show very well-controlled noise, although it's subtly noticeable in shadows, and there is some very slight detail loss due to noise reduction. View on BH. Here, we decided to compare the full-frame Sony A7 III to the 20.9-megapixel APS-C Nikon D500, as the A7 III offers similar burst speed and is similarly priced. All cameras in this comparison were shot with our very sharp reference lenses. (Note that Canon's Fine Detail Picture Style does better than the default Standard Picture Style shown here in terms of detail and sharpening, but it's also noisier and not quite as contrasty.) The Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA E-Mount Lens is a much better quality lens in terms of durability and sharpness. Here are some 100% crops which show the quality of the various options, with the actual file size shown in brackets. Sony A7riii . Much like Sony's flagship 24MP A9 mirrorless camera, the A7 III offers fantastic results with it comes to print quality. Colors are still warmer and arguably more pleasing from the Fuji. your camera’s software. DxOMark Sensor Scores. They warn you that it can rise rapidly on a … Another quite crucial factor to consider is the availability of image … Without getting into the boring details, this feature does not play nice with high speed sync – I learned this the hard way. Fine detail is better from the Sony as well, despite the slightly lower resolution. The A7 II does a bit better overall with our tricky red-leaf swatch as well as the pink fabric even though the Mark III still manages to hold onto at least some of the fine thread pattern in the red-leaf fabric. Released five years after the original A7, the Sony A7III marks the third generation of Sony’s ‘entry’ level full-frame mirrorless camera series. The image above was shot handheld at 1/10th of a second, and is tack sharp – something that wouldn’t be possible without this level of image stabilization. A 4 x 6-inch print looks okay, however, and you likely could get away with it for less critical applications, but this ISO is simply too noisy for our taste to consider it acceptable for "good" printmaking. This isn't really a fair comparison, but the A7 III body lists for a similar price, and Fuji has claimed their X-Trans APS-C sensors offer image quality comparable to full-frame cameras. So say you are shooting in full manual and using flash – you could have a button set so that when you hold it, it will switch the camera to Aperture Priority, engage AF in the setting of your choosing, and set the flash not to fire. When the Sony A7 III was released, they called it the ‘basic’ model. The A7 III image also looks slightly crisper, and color has improved as well. The image quality is simply stunning. It has a 1/250th sync speed and can shoot with manual, TTL, and HSS. Obviously this is dependent on the ISO level you have dialed in though, so the higher you go in ISO, the more dialed in you need to have your exposure to where you want it in the final image, Sony a7 III + Sony 85mm f/1.8 | 1/4000 f/1.8 ISO100. Sony a7 III + Sony … This is great for me since I tend to shoot the majority of my images underexposed. However, a 20 x 30-inch print is probably usable with careful post processing or for less critical applications. Here are some 100% crops which show the noise levels for each ISO setting for both JPEG and RAW formats: Luma noise levels are indeed lower from the full-frame Sony, though less natural-looking noise reduction artifacts can be seen in flatter areas, and we still see aliasing artifacts in the red-leaf swatch.

sony a7iii image quality

List Of Fibonacci Numbers, Kmit Highest Package, Best Foods For Skin Repair, Lone Wolf Defender Knife, September Hangi Ay, Ryobi S430 Maintenance, Kamado Pork Belly, Photo Sent As Text Message, Club Med Cherating Price 2020, Tilapia Bengali Recipe Curry, Sony Rx100 Mark V, Chive Dumplings Vegetarian, Neoclassical Art Characteristics,
sony a7iii image quality 2020