Is it possible toaddkeyto the Windows registry which would allow to configure IPP to load the user-selected version of the library, or tosetitto AUTO-DETECT(by default)? Intel IPP doesn't support GPUs. Hi, I am working on an application that uses the FFT of IPP. What weguarantee"generic" code of IPP will correctlywork on processors which is 100% compatible with Intel. Q2. Built around the same A14 CPU as the latest iPhone, the M1 is the first non-x86 CPU architecture to challenge companies like AMD and Intel … What favor is to be used for AMD processors? OpenCV is well-optimized for Intel platforms, in particular: A […] So you don't have to rewrite or recompile anything if you are using it on AMD system. AMD and Intel are both American Companies where they manufacture silicon-based products such as processors, chipsets, etc. IPP only works on desktop processors. I see, I have to repeat it again. If a build my own custom dll (that's what I'm doing for the moment), can I call directly targeted functions for PIII or PIV ? OpenCV project has been started at Intel back in 1998, with the first public release in 2000. The second problem is that buyers of AMD products demand that Intel would release their software optimized for AMD products as well, which is just nonsensical. Depending on the speed of the CPU, one may execute software more quickly than the other, but both will work. In 2010, Intel published an article on how the CPU dispatching works in the Intel Performance Primitives (IPP) function library. Though these companies produce different other products as well, in this article, we mai… These functions (ippStaticInit, ippStaticInitCpu, ippStaticFree) do nothing when they called from DLLs. Let us be honest, very fast program doing wrong calculations makes no sense for anyone. What about AMD processors support, it is not only political question. Last week, Apple launched its M1 SoC. Even now, 20 years later, Intel Corporation still funds the core OpenCV development team and maintains the build farm. My CPU is Athlon 64. Intel IPP library (when linked with OpenCV) will provide some speedup due to intensive use of SIMD instruction set. > The point is that I also have size constraints. Or can we compile our IPP codes with any other c-c++ compiler such as MSVC? you can't call Advapi's Registry functions - quite disappointing, isn't it?). The compilers generate optimized code for IA-32 and Intel 64 architectures, and non-optimized code for non-Intel but compatible processors, such as certain AMD processors. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. It needs to run on Intel as well as on AMD processors. Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives (Intel® IPP) is an extensive library of ready-to-use, domain-specific functions that are highly optimized for diverse Intel® architectures. Lastrelease of IPP detects exactly same Athlon as a … Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. Inmany cases, there are no good alternatives to Intel's function libraries. (Intel and AMD, x86/64 architectures. Core math functions include BLAS, LAPACK, ScaLAPACK, sparse solvers, fast Fourier transforms, and vector math.. Because Intel has dominant position on CPU market, other vendors do mimic behaviour of Intel CPUs for software compatibility (though internal design of"other" CPUs can be quite different) - so machine code optimized for Intel CPUsis also pretty efficient on other processors. "Generic" code has no SIMD optimizations.Such codecannot be used as a foundation of cometitive high-perfomance application because it does not take full advantage of available capabilities of modern CPU (not even close), despite all its "safety". Difference between AMD and Intel products are observable in their performance and features. Or do we develop the code with IPP support but it won't work optimized if it detects a non-Intel cpu ? I can recommend the following workaround. Hello, I am trying to use IPP to compute dot product of two 16-bit integer vectors. Its royalty-free APIs help developers: Take advantage of Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) instructions Hi, we are developing an image/signal processing application that need to work without a processor-brand constraint. 2.8K views View 24 Upvoters 1. Guys, you are doing great job with IPP library.The only doubt I have is the futuresupport for AMD processors. We can't guarantee the performance benefits of code which was tightly optimized for Intel architecture when it will run on other architecture. Intel vs AMD – Laptop processors. Thanks for your help. I remember that older version of IPL detected AMD Athlon as Pentium III and used PIII optimizations. It's the PX code that should be dispatched on all non-Intel processor-based systems. I discovered that IPP function ippsDotProd_16s64s does not use SSE[1,2,3] instructions if 64-bit version is used, while32-bit version does employ SSE3 ones. P8/Y8 Internal Run-Time Dispatcher Within the 32-bit 'p8' and equivalent 64-bit 'y8' architectures there is an additional "run-time" dispatching mechanism, a kind of mini-dispatcher. Thanks for all your tricks. OpenCV can be compiled statically with IPP libraries from Intel also which can speed up some function. Of course I have to declare and export them but Do you think it will work ? I'd like to get this info for some other processors as well. I am simply interested whether my "ready to deploy" application will run on either systems. IPP doesn't disable any optimizations for AMD CPUs - IPP dispatching mechanism is based on features supported by current CPU, so as Phenom II supports SSE2 and SSE3 - w7 code should be dispatched for ia32 mode and m7 for x64. What if the instruction set is different? // Intel is committed to respecting human rights and avoiding complicity in human rights abuses. Intel IPP Cryptography is an add-on library that offers Intel IPP users a cross-platform and cross operating system application programming interface (API) for routines commonly used for cryptographic operations. Especially that might work accross ARM9, ARM11 and Cortex-A8/A9's (not necessarily with the same level of performance boost). I hope it is not something like this: IFCPUID()= "AuthenticAMD" THENpx(). The article indicates a fair handling of non-Intel processors in the IPP library. We do very thin optimization for Intel architecture, and we can't guarantee any resultsfor this optimized codeon other architecture. Intel IPP is … is there a strict constraint to use Intel C++ compiler for optimized solution? It works fine for me... WillI be able to use IPP on AMD processors? It was kind of "preview" product - Intel 8.0 Preview, which was discontinued. We are glad to have pleasant feedback:). And of course, we do not guaranteethe compatibility of third party processors with Intel architecture. You can live without it if you still have first order optimization i.e. For non-Intel based processors support, please see the article titled Use Intel® IPP on Intel or Compatible AMD* Processors. There are other architectures, but they're niche, and you would probably know if you had a CPU with one of those niche architectures because you would have bought the CPU with a particular goal in mind. Generic code was developed for processors which 100% compatible with Intel architecture. Likewise, Intel is supplying a lot of highly optimizedfunction libraries for many different technical and scientific applications. Historically IPP works on AMD chips as most AMD chips is Intel compatible. In processor market, Intel is the most famous, but AMD processors are also at a level that provides a tight competition for Intel. Yes, IPP does contain optimized code for Intel micro architecture. I develop an IPP custom dll with a subset of IPP, enabling OpenMP, compiled with Intel C++ 10.2. This gives me a small … BTW, it would be interesting to take a look atthe non kosher MMX instruction producing wrong resultson Athlon. The Intel vs AMD rivalry isn’t exclusive to the desktop space, as it also continues over to the laptop market. By the way, thank you very much for having taking time answering to me, that's great . Will youNOT implement "special measures" to prevent using your libraryon AMD processors? manufacturers supporting the same instruction set. One note about the "right" DLL.In IPP"right" DLL is DLL which was designed forappropriate processor.Not only instruction set is taken into account here. But, at least, if some third party CPU supports compatible SIMD instruction set (MMX,SSE,SSE2,SSE3)then it isreasonable to load"right'DLLs i.e. How come AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition (4 cores @ 3.4 GHZ) or AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (6 core @ 3.0 GHz) is not sufficient to run PS 2021, while Intel Core i3-2310M (2 core @ 2.1GHz) is considered enough? Many software programmers consider Intel's compiler the best optimizingcompiler on the market, and it is often the preferred compiler for the mostcritical applications. But usually they are less important than ability to process several values at once (SIMD).I believe that impact of differences in these featuresis not so critical. As a matter of fact, IPL version 3.0 with Pentium III optimizations is running perfectly on my Athlon. Among other features, the library includes: It would be hard to expect that IPP supported all existing CPU microarchitectures. Following are the directoreis I see in the install CD. I'm using a machine with AMD processor for upgrading IPP 3.0 to 5.0. For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice. I know you don't provide any support when linking statically and "forcing" a processor type using ippStaticInitCpu, but I would like to know if it's possible to do so while linking dynamically ... No, there is no way to force cpu-specific code using for DLLs. Thereason … Message Edited by ZXS on 06-04-2004 04:41 PM. So, a generic version of our IPP code is generated automatically by Intel compiler, is it that ? Yes, as shyaki said, the current AMD processor areat least support SSE2 and support same intruction set as Intel Processor, soIPP will use at least "w7" codeon such kind of cpus. Becausethe answermay depend on the things not known at compile time likepatterns of input, CPU load (other apps running in background and polluting cache), L2 cache size, type and speed of main RAM,etc. I sent this question to AMD tech support's "CPU …